Return to Headlines

Fed to Potentially Soften Pathway as Recession Lurks

Article Sponsored By Premier Partner:

Stifel

 

On July 29, 2022, Stifel’s Chief Economist, Lindsey Piegza, Ph.D., published Economic Insight, excerpts from this publication are included below.

Fed to Potentially Soften Pathway as Recession Lurks
Earlier this week, as expected, the Federal Reserve opted to raise rates another 75bps, taking the target range for the federal funds rate to 2.25-2.50%. Also as expected, the July FOMC statement indicated further increases would likely be appropriate. However, with inflation still too-high, and the economy beginning to show signs of waning momentum, what is the future pathway for policy? Will the Fed continue at this more aggressive pace to ensure a reduction in cost pressures, or will it downgrade the size of future rate hikes amid a rising risk of recession? Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell attempted to strike a balance, suggesting incoming data will drive policy decisions meeting to meeting. The market, however, is betting on the Committee cracking in its resolve to bring down costs as domestic weakness becomes increasingly apparent.

Policy Announcement
Meeting market expectations, the Fed unanimously agreed to a 75bp increase in the federal funds target range this week after raising rates a similar 75bps in June. Since March, the Committee has increased the target by 225bps to 2.50%, the highest level since August 2019.

Ahead of this week’s rate decision, market participants had begun to consider a full one-percentage point increase following a larger-than-expected increase in the June CPI and PPI reports. With a growing expectation, however, that inflation may have peaked with a more recent retreat in commodity prices, coupled with some Fed officials voicing concerns of a “super-sized” rate hike, investors reduced forecasts from 100bps back down to a second-round 75bp rate hike. In other words, the policy announcement itself was uneventful, to say the least.

In the July FOMC statement, the Committee maintained language suggesting "ongoing increases in the target range will be appropriate." The size, however, of additional rate hikes going forward is now the bigger question. When asked during the press conference about the potential for a 100bp increase down the road, Powell was clear that the Committee “would not hesitate” to implement a 1% increase or larger if deemed appropriate based on the incoming data. For now, however, sending somewhat of a mixed message, Powell reiterated that the Committee felt a 75bp hike was the “appropriate” move as the full weight of earlier rate increases have likely not been felt and policy is likely at or nearing neutral.

Year-End Target
According to the Fed’s latest Summary of Economic Projections (SEP), the majority of Committee members anticipate rates rising to 3.50% by year-end. While this forecast is now six weeks old and produced before the latest, hotter-than-expected June inflation reports, Powell indicated it is still the best indication of policy makers’ expectations for rates over the next five months. That being said, he emphasized the difficulty in forecasting monetary policy during the best of times, which given the unprecedented amount of uncertainty in the current environment, has become increasingly more difficult. Policy, he said, will be made on a meting to-meeting basis predicated on incoming data and without the benefit of more explicit guidance offered ahead of prior meetings.

Despite Powell’s lack of specificity, market participants appear to be focusing in on the more dovish aspect of his comments. In fact, according to Bloomberg, investors are beginning to soften their outlook for additional rate increases, with a 50bp hike in September fully priced in followed by an expectation for two additional quarter-point hikes in November and December.

During the press conference, Powell indicated that they are trying not to make a mistake in either direction when repeatedly asked if the bigger risk for policy makers was doing too much or doing too little. He did note that they recognize there are two sides. Doing too much may impose more downward pressure on the economy than is necessary, however, doing too little and leaving cost pressures entrenched in the economy only leaves a larger cost of having to deal with lingering inflation later. In other words, doing more now ensures a more stable economy and allows for a stronger labor market over the longer run.

Economic Weakness
Despite attempts to muster a hawkish stance or mirror the Fed’s earlier war cry of “whatever it takes” against inflation, Powell’s comments this week seemed to reinforce expectations for a slower pace of rate hikes and a softer level of growth. At this point, investors seem to be losing hope the Fed will be able to raise rates and tackle inflation, while avoiding meaningful economic damage, producing the so-called soft landing. Following the Fed’s rate announcement, equities rose sharply with the Dow gaining 1.4%, the S&P 500 rising 2.6%, and Nasdaq jumping 4.1%. Longer-term yields, meanwhile, pushed lower with the 10-year dropping 9bps to a low of 2.72% before finishing the day at 2.79%.

Conclusion
The Federal Reserve was arguably late to the inflation party, failing to drop the transitory language until late 2021 when inflation was already reaching new four-decade highs. Nevertheless, at this point, with four rate hikes and 225bps of tightening already underway, the Fed may be forced to raise rates at a significantly more aggressive pace to rein in cost pressures than would have otherwise been needed had the Committee taken action sooner. Of course, putting what the Fed should have done behind us, the question remains what will the Fed do now? Powell continues to toe the hawkish line of maintaining a focus on inflation, assuring the market that reinstating price stability is the Fed’s primary goal. It “must be done” he asserted. However, his comments focusing on the emerging weakness in domestic activity, coupled with the lack of forward guidance has led many investors to question the Fed’s resolve for a continued aggressive approach to policy. In other words, does the Fed have the stomach to keep raising rates with a recession lurking around the corner? The Fed says yes, the market says no. Who will flinch first?